Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines for Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for The International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Creative Innovation Ideas in Education (THE MIR) Your expertise and critical evaluation are essential to maintaining the quality and integrity of our publication. These guidelines outline the peer review process, your responsibilities as a reviewer, and instructions for submitting your review through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform.

Overview of the Peer Review Process
Our journal employs a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure impartiality. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers based on its originality, scientific rigor, relevance to the journal’s scope, and contribution to the field. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and a recommendation to the editor, who makes the final publication decision.

Reviewer Responsibilities
As a reviewer, your role is to:

Assess the quality, validity, and significance of the submitted manuscript.
Provide detailed, constructive, and respectful feedback to help authors improve their work.
Submit your review within the specified timeline (typically 2–4 weeks, depending on the journal’s policy).
Maintain confidentiality by not sharing or discussing the manuscript with others outside the review process.
Declare any potential conflicts of interest (e.g., personal, professional, or financial relationships with the authors) to the editor before accepting the review invitation.
Review Criteria
Please evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:

Originality and Novelty: Does the work present new findings, creative ideas, or innovative approaches that contribute to the field?
Relevance to Scope: Does the manuscript align with the journal’s focus and scope of multidisciplinary research and innovation in education for THE MIR?
Scientific Rigor: Are the research methodology, data analysis, and conclusions sound and well-supported?
Clarity and Structure: Is the manuscript well-written, logically organized, and free of major grammatical or typographical errors?
Significance: Does the work have practical or theoretical implications for researchers, educators, or practitioners in the field?
References: Are the citations appropriate, current, and formatted according to the journal’s style (e.g., Chicago Author-Date)?
Additional considerations specific to the journal’s scope may include [customize as needed]:

For THE MIR: Evaluation of multidisciplinary approaches or creative educational innovations.
For IJITECHVE: Assessment of IT system evaluations (e.g., UAT, Usability Testing) or vocational training outcomes.
Steps to Complete Your Review in OJS
Accept or Decline the Invitation
Log in to your OJS account at THE MIR login page.
Navigate to “My Queue” or “Reviewer Tasks” to view the review request.
Click “Accept Review” or “Decline Review” within [insert time frame, e.g., 3 days] of receiving the invitation. If declining, please provide a brief reason (e.g., lack of expertise, time constraints).
Download the Manuscript
Once accepted, access the manuscript file under the “Review Files” section. Download and review the anonymized document carefully.
Submit Your Review
In OJS, go to the “Review” tab for the assigned submission.
Complete the review form, which may include:
Comments to the Editor: Confidential feedback for the editor only (e.g., overall assessment, recommendation).
Comments to the Author: Constructive feedback for the author, avoiding any identifying remarks.
Optionally, upload an annotated version of the manuscript if you wish to provide detailed comments directly on the file (ensure anonymity).
Make a Recommendation
Select one of the following options in OJS:
Accept Submission: The manuscript is ready for publication with no or minor revisions.
Revisions Required: Minor changes are needed before acceptance.
Resubmit for Review: Major revisions are required, warranting another round of review.
Decline Submission: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards or scope.
Submit Your Review
Click “Submit Review” to finalize your evaluation. Ensure all fields are completed before submission. You will receive a confirmation email from OJS.
Guidelines for Writing Your Review
Be Constructive: Offer specific, actionable suggestions to improve the manuscript, even if recommending rejection.
Be Objective: Base your assessment on evidence and scholarly merit, not personal bias.
Be Respectful: Use professional and courteous language, recognizing the effort of the authors.
Be Detailed: Provide examples or references to support your critique (e.g., “The methodology lacks clarity in describing the sample size; consider specifying…”).
Be Timely: Complete your review by the deadline provided in OJS (typically 2–4 weeks). If you need an extension, contact the editor via the “Discussion” feature in OJS.
Confidentiality and Ethical Standards
Do not disclose any details about the manuscript, its content, or your review to anyone outside the editorial process.
Avoid using the manuscript’s data or ideas for your own research.
If you suspect plagiarism, fabrication, or ethical issues (e.g., duplicate submission), notify the editor confidentially via OJS.
Using OJS Features
Discussion Tool: Use the “Add Discussion” option to communicate directly with the editor if clarification is needed (e.g., regarding deadlines or manuscript content).
Review History: After submission, you can view your completed reviews under “Completed” in your OJS dashboard.
Technical Support: If you encounter issues with OJS, contact the editorial team at author.

Reviewer Guidelines for Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for The International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Creative Innovation Ideas in Education (THE MIR) Your expertise and critical evaluation are essential to maintaining the quality and integrity of our publication. These guidelines outline the peer review process, your responsibilities as a reviewer, and instructions for submitting your review through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform.

Overview of the Peer Review Process
Our journal employs a double-blind peer review process, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to ensure impartiality. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers based on its originality, scientific rigor, relevance to the journal’s scope, and contribution to the field. Reviewers provide constructive feedback and a recommendation to the editor, who makes the final publication decision.

Reviewer Responsibilities
As a reviewer, your role is to:

Assess the quality, validity, and significance of the submitted manuscript.
Provide detailed, constructive, and respectful feedback to help authors improve their work.
Submit your review within the specified timeline (typically 2–4 weeks, depending on the journal’s policy).
Maintain confidentiality by not sharing or discussing the manuscript with others outside the review process.
Declare any potential conflicts of interest (e.g., personal, professional, or financial relationships with the authors) to the editor before accepting the review invitation.
Review Criteria
Please evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:

Originality and Novelty: Does the work present new findings, creative ideas, or innovative approaches that contribute to the field?
Relevance to Scope: Does the manuscript align with the journal’s focus and scope of multidisciplinary research and innovation in education for THE MIR?
Scientific Rigor: Are the research methodology, data analysis, and conclusions sound and well-supported?
Clarity and Structure: Is the manuscript well-written, logically organized, and free of major grammatical or typographical errors?
Significance: Does the work have practical or theoretical implications for researchers, educators, or practitioners in the field?
References: Are the citations appropriate, current, and formatted according to the journal’s style (e.g., Chicago Author-Date)?
Additional considerations specific to the journal’s scope may include [customize as needed]:

For THE MIR: Evaluation of multidisciplinary approaches or creative educational innovations.
For IJITECHVE: Assessment of IT system evaluations (e.g., UAT, Usability Testing) or vocational training outcomes.
Steps to Complete Your Review in OJS
Accept or Decline the Invitation
Log in to your OJS account at THE MIR login page.
Navigate to “My Queue” or “Reviewer Tasks” to view the review request.
Click “Accept Review” or “Decline Review” within [insert time frame, e.g., 3 days] of receiving the invitation. If declining, please provide a brief reason (e.g., lack of expertise, time constraints).
Download the Manuscript
Once accepted, access the manuscript file under the “Review Files” section. Download and review the anonymized document carefully.
Submit Your Review
In OJS, go to the “Review” tab for the assigned submission.
Complete the review form, which may include:
Comments to the Editor: Confidential feedback for the editor only (e.g., overall assessment, recommendation).
Comments to the Author: Constructive feedback for the author, avoiding any identifying remarks.
Optionally, upload an annotated version of the manuscript if you wish to provide detailed comments directly on the file (ensure anonymity).
Make a Recommendation
Select one of the following options in OJS:
Accept Submission: The manuscript is ready for publication with no or minor revisions.
Revisions Required: Minor changes are needed before acceptance.
Resubmit for Review: Major revisions are required, warranting another round of review.
Decline Submission: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards or scope.
Submit Your Review
Click “Submit Review” to finalize your evaluation. Ensure all fields are completed before submission. You will receive a confirmation email from OJS.
Guidelines for Writing Your Review
Be Constructive: Offer specific, actionable suggestions to improve the manuscript, even if recommending rejection.
Be Objective: Base your assessment on evidence and scholarly merit, not personal bias.
Be Respectful: Use professional and courteous language, recognizing the effort of the authors.
Be Detailed: Provide examples or references to support your critique (e.g., “The methodology lacks clarity in describing the sample size; consider specifying…”).
Be Timely: Complete your review by the deadline provided in OJS (typically 2–4 weeks). If you need an extension, contact the editor via the “Discussion” feature in OJS.
Confidentiality and Ethical Standards
Do not disclose any details about the manuscript, its content, or your review to anyone outside the editorial process.
Avoid using the manuscript’s data or ideas for your own research.
If you suspect plagiarism, fabrication, or ethical issues (e.g., duplicate submission), notify the editor confidentially via OJS.
Using OJS Features
Discussion Tool: Use the “Add Discussion” option to communicate directly with the editor if clarification is needed (e.g., regarding deadlines or manuscript content).
Review History: After submission, you can view your completed reviews under “Completed” in your OJS dashboard.
Technical Support: If you encounter issues with OJS, contact the editorial team at author.ijomrciie@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id.
Recognition
Your contribution as a reviewer is invaluable. While reviews are anonymous, This Journal may acknowledge reviewers annually in a published list (with consent) or provide a certificate of appreciation upon request. Your efforts help uphold the journal’s commitment to scholarly excellence.

Contact Information
For questions about the review process or the OJS platform, please reach out to the editorial team via author.ijomrciie@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id. For inquiries, contact principal.ijomrciie@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id or via Whatsapp. 

@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id.
Recognition
Your contribution as a reviewer is invaluable. While reviews are anonymous, This Journal may acknowledge reviewers annually in a published list (with consent) or provide a certificate of appreciation upon request. Your efforts help uphold the journal’s commitment to scholarly excellence.

Contact Information
For questions about the review process or the OJS platform, please reach out to the editorial team via author.the.mir@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id. For inquiries, contact principal.the.mir@journal.bizscript-studio.co.id or via Whatsapp.